Pregnancy Outcomes and Obstetrical Complications of Twin Pregnancies with Endometriosis: A Single-Center Cohort Study

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: There are many studies regarding the increased relationship between pregnancy outcomes of singleton with endometriosis. However, there was limited evidence of twin pregnancies with endometriosis. This study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes and complications in twin pregnancies with or without endometriosis in a single institution. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to July 2022, a retrospective analysis of twin pregnancies was conducted. The endometriosis group included patient with histological or visual confirmation before pregnancy or during cesarean section. Pregnancy outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Out of 1714 patients examined, 127 (7.4%) were included in the endometriosis group. Maternal body mass index (BMI) was lower in the endometriosis group (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in maternal age, mode of conception, chorionicity, and pregnancy outcomes, such as gestational age at delivery (p=0.835) and the preterm birth rate (p=0.579). The endometriosis group had a significantly higher rate of obstetrical complication: small for gestational age (SGA) <10% (p=0.029). However, after adjustment for BMI, the endometriosis group showed no statistical significance in obstetrical complications, including SGA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.568; 95% confidence interval, 0.984–2.499; p=0.059). Conclusion: Twin pregnancies with endometriosis were not related to adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes and obstetrical complications. To confirm these outcomes, further large prospective studies are required.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shin, J. S., Kim, S., Choi, J. Y., Hong, K., Shim, S., Jung, Y. W., … Kim, M. L. (2024). Pregnancy Outcomes and Obstetrical Complications of Twin Pregnancies with Endometriosis: A Single-Center Cohort Study. Yonsei Medical Journal, 65(6), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0099

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free