Fossil fuel subsidy reform in the developing world: Who wins, who loses, and why?

16Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fossil fuel subsidies are widespread in developing countries, where reform efforts are often derailed by disputes over the likely distribution of gains and losses. The impacts of subsidy reform are transmitted to households through changes in energy prices and prices of other goods and services, as well as through factor earnings. Most empirical studies focus on consumer expenditures alone, and computable general equilibrium analyses typically report only total effects without decomposing them by source. Meanwhile, analytical models neglect important open-economy characteristics relevant to developing countries. In this paper, we develop an analytical model of a small open economy with a preexisting fossil fuel subsidy and identify direct and indirect impacts of subsidy reform on real household incomes. Our results, illustrated with data from Viet Nam, highlight two important drivers of distributional change: (i) the mix of tradable and nontradable goods, reflecting the structure of a trade-dependent economy; and (ii) household heterogeneity in sources of factor income.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coxhead, I., & Grainger, C. (2018). Fossil fuel subsidy reform in the developing world: Who wins, who loses, and why? Asian Development Review, 35(2), 180–203. https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free