Involuntary attention and identification accuracy

43Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using the spatial cuing paradigm, Prinzmetal, McCool, and Park (2005) made the distinction between voluntary and involuntary attention. They claimed that although accuracy was affected by an informative spatial cue (which controls voluntary attention), it was not affected by a noninformative cue (which controls involuntary attention). We reevaluate two reports that assert that noninformative spatial cues affect accuracy. Dufour (1999) reported that a noninformative auditory cue enhanced visual identification in a conjunction search task. Klein and Dick (2002) reported that, in an RSVP task with visual cues, the cue also enhanced accuracy at short stimulus onset asynchronies. We found that Dufour's results were due to overt orienting (eye movements) rather than to covert attention. The results of Klein and Dick were due either to location uncertainty or to a confounding of the order of stimulus presentation and condition. Copyright 2005 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prinzmetal, W., Park, S., & Garrett, R. (2005). Involuntary attention and identification accuracy. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(8), 1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free