Abstract
Objectives: To compare the effects of midazolam, which is a fast and short-acting benzodiazepine, and diphenhydramine, which is a widely used anticholinergic agent, in clinical practice for the treatment of metoclopramide-induced akathisia. Methods: All adults older than 17 years given metoclopramide for nausea and vomiting or for headache and who had akathisia were eligible for this clinical, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive diphenhydramine or midazolam. Subjective, objective, and total akathisia scores and modified Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were recorded. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the efficacy and side effects of the medications. Results: Forty-one (73.3%) of the 56 enrolled patients were women. The mean (±SD) age was 39.9 (±15.7) years in the diphenhydramine group and 40.9 (±16.2) years in the midazolam group. Mean subjective, objective, and total akathisia scores in the first 5 minutes declined considerably in the midazolam group compared with the diphenhydramine group (p < 0.001). However, the mean Ramsay Sedation Scale score in the first 15 minutes increased significantly in the midazolam group compared with the diphenhydramine group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Midazolam can correct the symptoms of metoclopramide-induced akathisia faster than diphenhydramine, but it causes more sedation. © 2007 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Parlak, I., Erdur, B., Parlak, M., Ergin, A., Ayrik, C., Tomruk, O., … Ergin, N. (2007). Midazolam vs. Diphenhydramine for the Treatment of Metoclopramide-induced Akathisia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(8), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2007.01.021
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.