The case for not masking away repetitive DNA

46Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the course of analyzing whole-genome data, it is common practice to mask or filter out repetitive regions of a genome, such as transposable elements and endogenous retroviruses, in order to focus only on genes and thus simplify the results. This Commentary is a plea from one member of the Mobile DNA community to all gene-centric researchers: please do not ignore the repetitive fraction of the genome. Please stop narrowing your findings by only analyzing a minority of the genome, and instead broaden your analyses to include the rich biology of repetitive and mobile DNA. In this article, I present four arguments supporting a case for retaining repetitive DNA in your genome-wide analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slotkin, R. K. (2018, May 1). The case for not masking away repetitive DNA. Mobile DNA. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-018-0120-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free