Meta-analyses of animal studies: An introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare

170Citations
Citations of this article
209Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In research aimed at improving human health care, animal studies still play a crucial role, despite political and scientific efforts to reduce preclinical experimentation in laboratory animals. In animal studies, the results and their interpretation are not always straightforward, as no single study is executed perfectly in all steps. There are several possible sources of bias, and many animal studies are replicates of studies conducted previously. Use of meta-analysis to combine the results of studies may lead to more reliable conclusions and a reduction of unnecessary duplication of animal studies. In addition, due to the more exploratory nature of animal studies as compared to clinical trials, meta-analyses of animal studies have greater potential in exploring possible sources of heterogeneity. There is an abundance of literature on how to performmetaanalyses on clinical data. Animal studies, however, differ from clinical studies in some aspects, such as the diversity of animal species studied, experimental design, and study characteristics. In this paper,we will discuss the main principles and practices for meta-analyses of experimental animal studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hooijmans, C. R., IntHout, J., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., & Rovers, M. M. (2014). Meta-analyses of animal studies: An introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare. ILAR Journal, 55(3), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilu042

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free