Toward a Unified Framework in Molecular Neurobiology of Alzheimer’s Disease: Revisiting the Pathophysiological Hypotheses

Abstract

Despite decades of research, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains without a curative therapy. While amyloid- and tau-centered approaches have dominated the field, failures of monotherapeutic strategies underscore the need for a broader system-level understanding. Here, this review critically revisits the principal hypotheses of AD pathogenesis, including the amyloid cascade, tauopathy, neuroinflammation, cholinergic dysfunction, oxidative and mitochondrial stress, metal dyshomeostasis, autophagy–lysosomal failure, genetic susceptibility, and infectious triggers. This review synthesizes molecular and cellular evidence from human genetics, neuropathology, and experimental models, correcting common misconceptions and emphasizing interactions between pathways. Neuroinflammation is increasingly recognized as a central hub linking amyloid, tau, and vascular factors, while mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunctions emerge as amplifiers of proteotoxic stress. Genetic studies highlight apolipoprotein-E ε4 (APOE ε4) as the strongest common risk allele, but also implicate genes involved in endosomal trafficking, lipid metabolism, and immune regulation. Taken together, AD is best understood as a multi-hit disorder in which converging processes, rather than a single driver, dictate disease initiation and progression. This narrative review proposes a systems neurobiology framework that integrates these mechanisms and identifies key points of convergence amenable to therapeutic targeting and biomarker development. Finally, this reappraisal aims to inform future research directions and guide the rational design of multi-target interventions.