EVIDENCE AGAINST A CONSTANT‐DIFFERENCE EFFECT IN CONCURRENT‐CHAINS SCHEDULES

  • Mazur J
2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Savastano and Fantino (1996) reported that in concurrent‐chains schedules, initial‐link choice proportions remained constant as terminal‐link durations increased as long as the subtractive difference between the two terminal‐link schedules remained constant. Two experiments with pigeons were conducted to examine this constant‐difference effect. Both experiments used equal variable‐interval schedules as initial links. The terminal links were fixed delays to reinforcement in Experiment 1 and variable delays to reinforcement in Experiment 2. The durations of the terminal links were varied across conditions, but the difference between pairs of terminal links was always 10 s. In both experiments, preference for the shorter terminal link became less extreme as terminal‐link durations increased, so a constant‐difference effect was not found. It is argued, however, that this choice situation does not provide clear evidence for or against delay‐reduction theory versus other theories of choice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mazur, J. E. (2002). EVIDENCE AGAINST A CONSTANT‐DIFFERENCE EFFECT IN CONCURRENT‐CHAINS SCHEDULES. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.77-147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free