Endoderm specification and differentiation in Xenopus embryos

69Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is known from work with amniote embryos that regional specification of the gut requires cell-cell signalling between the mesoderm and the endoderm. In recent years, much of the interest in Xenopus endoderm development has focused on events that occur before gastrulation and this work has led to a different model whereby regional specification of the endoderm is autonomous. In this paper, we examine the specification and differentiation of the endoderm in Xenopus using neurula and tail-bud-stage embryos and we show that the current hypothesis of stable autonomous regional specification is not correct. When the endoderm is isolated alone from neurula and tail bud stages, it remains fully viable but will not express markers of regional specification or differentiation. If mesoderm is present, regional markers are expressed. If recombinations are made between mesoderm and endoderm, then the endodermal markers expressed have the regional character of the mesoderm. Previous results with vegetal explants had shown that endodermal differentiation occurs cell-autonomously, in the absence of mesoderm. We have repeated these experiments and have found that the explants do in fact show some expression of mesoderm markers associated with lateral plate derivatives. We believe that the formation of mesoderm cells by the vegetal explants accounts for the apparent autonomous development of the endoderm. Since the fate map of the Xenopus gut shows that the mesoderm and endoderm of each level do not come together until tail bud stages, we conclude that stable regional specification of the endoderm must occur quite late, and as a result of inductive signals from the mesoderm. © 2001 Academic Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horb, M. E., & Slack, J. M. W. (2001). Endoderm specification and differentiation in Xenopus embryos. Developmental Biology, 236(2), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0347

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free