Comparative performance investigation of a dual evaporator cycle using an ejector with the conventional cycle using a pressure reducing valve

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The performance of a dual evaporator cycle using ejector is compared with a conventional cycle employing pressure reducing valve. In both the systems, high temperature evaporator is considered as a flooded evaporator, thus a separator is employed after the high temperature evaporator. However, low temperature evaporator is a kind of conventional dry evaporator. The comparison of both systems, i.e., conventional and ejector assisted, is done for the same cooling capacities and same dryness fraction at the exit of high temperature evaporator with R134a, R152a, and R1234yf refrigerants. The effects of varying the states of refrigerant at the exit of flooded evaporator, and temperatures of both the evaporators and the condenser are analyzed using Engineering Equation Solver. It is found that the compressor work is reduced in both the cycles with the rise in low temperature evaporator temperature; however, a little variation is observed in the total cooling effect. The cooling effect in high temperature evaporator is increased with the increase in dryness fraction at the exit of the high temperature flooded evaporator, but it is decreased in low temperature evaporator.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sachdeva, G., Jaiswar, A., Anuradha, P., & Jain, V. (2023). Comparative performance investigation of a dual evaporator cycle using an ejector with the conventional cycle using a pressure reducing valve. International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44189-023-00036-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free