Abstract
In recent discussions concerning the definition of argument, it has been maintained that the word 'argument' exhibits the process-product ambiguity, or an act/object ambiguity. Drawing on literature on lexical ambiguity we argue that 'argument' is not ambiguous. The term 'argument' refers to an object, not to a speech act. We also examine some of the important implications of our argument by considering the question: what sort of abstract objects are arguments? © Paul Simard-Smith and Andrei Moldovan.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Simard Smith, P. L., & Moldovan, A. (2011). Arguments as abstract objects. Informal Logic, 31(3), 230–261. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v31i3.3401
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.