One and Five-Year Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients with Moderate and Severe Aortic Stenosis

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

(1) Background: Our goal was to develop a risk prediction model for mortality in patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis (AS). (2) Methods: All patients aged 40–95 years, with echocardiographic evidence of moderate and severe AS at a single institution, were studied over a median of 2.8 (1.5–4.8) years, between 2013–2018. Patient characteristics and mortality were compared using Chi-squares, t-tests, and Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves, as appropriate. The risk calculation for mortality was derived using the Cox proportional hazards model. A risk score was calculated for each parameter, and the total sum of scores predicted the individualized risks of 1-and 5-year mortality. (3) Results: A total of 1991 patients with severe and 2212 with moderate AS were included. Severe AS patients were older, had a lower ejection fraction %, were more likely to be Caucasian, and had lower rates of obesity and smoking, but had higher rates of cardiac comorbidities and AVR (49.3% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.0001). The unadjusted overall mortality was 41.7% vs. 41%, p = 0.6530, and was not different using KM curves (log rank, p = 0.0853). The models included only patients with complete follow-up (3966 in the 1-year, and 816 in the 5-year model) and included 13 variables related to patient characteristics, degree of AS, and AVR. The C-statistic was 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1-year and the 5-year models, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Patients with moderate and severe AS experience high morbidity and mortality. The usage of a risk prediction model may provide guidance for clinical decision making in complex patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yousef, S., Amabile, A., Huang, H., Agarwal, R., Singh, S., Ram, C., … Vallabhajosyula, P. (2022). One and Five-Year Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients with Moderate and Severe Aortic Stenosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102949

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free