Nonreferral of possible soft tissue sarcomas in adults: A dangerous omission in policy

33Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in three groups of STS patients treated in our specialist centre: patients referred immediately after an inadequate initial treatment, patients referred after a local recurrence, and patients referred directly, prior to any treatment. Patients and methods. We reviewed all our nonmetastatic extremity-STS patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We compared three patient groups: those referred directly to our centre (group A), those referred after an inadequate initial excision (group B), and patients with local recurrence (group C). Results. The study included 174 patients. Disease-free survival was 73%, 76%, and 28% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abellan, J. F., Lamo De Espinosa, J. M., Duart, J., Patiño-García, A., Martin-Algarra, S., Martínez-Monge, R., & San-Julian, M. (2009). Nonreferral of possible soft tissue sarcomas in adults: A dangerous omission in policy. Sarcoma, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/827912

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free