A new explanation of persistent double meteor trains

9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Persistent meteor trains, studied for more than a century, remain somewhat mysterious [Newton, 1869; Trowbridge, 1907; Chapman, 1955; Hapgood, 1980]. The Leonids meteor showers of recent years afforded opportunities to apply new research technologies, including lidars and sophisticated cameras. Here we explore a particularly curious but common feature: double trains. Since the traditional hollow cylinder explanation has been shown to be untenable, we suggest a new explanation, arguing that one train is due to gaseous vapor train emissions behind the meteor while the other is due to heterogeneous chemistry associated with recoagulated dust. In this model the separation is caused by gravitational sedimentation of dust particles, an idea supported by rocket-based observations of recoagulated dust behind a meteor, by rocket-based observations of enhanced sodium emissions in a dust layer, by rocket observations of a dusty trail, and by recent theoretical estimates of chemical reactions on dust. Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelley, M. C., Krushwitz, C., Drummond, J., Gardner, C., Gelinas, L., Hecht, J., … Collins, S. (2003). A new explanation of persistent double meteor trains. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free