Abstract
It is widely assumed that 5 participants suffice for usability testing. In this study, 60 users were tested and random sets of 5 or more were sampled from the whole, to demonstrate the risks of using only 5 participants and the benefits of using more. Some of the randomly selected sets of 5 participants found 99% of the problems; other sets found only 55%. With 10 users, the lowest percentage of problems revealed by any one set was increased to 80%, and with 20 users, to 95%.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. In Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers (Vol. 35, pp. 379–383). Psychonomic Society Inc. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195514
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.