Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing

802Citations
Citations of this article
1.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is widely assumed that 5 participants suffice for usability testing. In this study, 60 users were tested and random sets of 5 or more were sampled from the whole, to demonstrate the risks of using only 5 participants and the benefits of using more. Some of the randomly selected sets of 5 participants found 99% of the problems; other sets found only 55%. With 10 users, the lowest percentage of problems revealed by any one set was increased to 80%, and with 20 users, to 95%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. In Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers (Vol. 35, pp. 379–383). Psychonomic Society Inc. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195514

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free