Prevalence of oncology nurses' compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue: Systematic review and meta-analysis

68Citations
Citations of this article
177Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To systematically review and comprehensively analyse findings of studies reporting oncology nurses' compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO) and secondary traumatic stress (STS), measured by the professional quality of life (ProQOL) scale, and explore CS and CF related factors. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional and interventional studies. Method: Electronic databases were searched using keywords, and the review followed PRISMA guidelines. The prevalence of CS, BO and STS and their instrumental ratings were pooled using random effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression studies explored the effects of variables. Results: Fifteen studies (sample size 2,509) were reviewed, and nine were in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of CS, BO, and STS were 22.89%, 62.79% and 66.84%, respectively. No substantial correlation was found for independent variables, possibly due to sample size. There was a weak negative correlation between CS and BO [−0.06(0.90)] and a weak positive correlation between CS and STS [0.20(0.70)].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Algamdi, M. (2022, January 1). Prevalence of oncology nurses’ compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing Open. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free