Soybean Nodulation and Plant Response to Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization in the Northern US

  • Cigelske B
  • Kandel H
  • DeSutter T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] seed yields in the northern United States may increase with the application of fertilizers; however Nitrogen (N) may decrease root nodulation. This study was conducted to understand the impact of N and sulfur (S) fertilization on soybean nodulation, plant, shoot and root biomass. Two cultivars were planted in experiments across ten site-years during 2015-2016. Plant observations took place at the V4 and R4 soybean growth stages. There were 41% more nodules per plant at R4 compared to V4 (38.3 vs 27.2 nodules, respectively). Cultivars responded differently to N and S fertilizer. The nodules per plant between the cultivars (30.3 vs 24.4) were different as well as the percent medium and large-sized nodules, which indicates the need to evaluate additional genotypes. Adding N decreased root nodulation (from 31.8 to 23.7 nodules per plant) and decreased nodule size but had no effect on plant, shoot or root mass. Averaged across N rates total plant mass was 2.26 and 11.36 g per plant at V4 and R4, respectively. Shoot mass, average across N rates was 1.77 and 9.65 g per plant at V4 and R4, respectively, and root mass, average across N rates was 0.49 and 1.71 g per plant at V4 and R4, respectively. Sulfur did not have an effect on nodules per plant but increased the percent medium size nodules at the R4 observation. There was no N by S interaction observed for nodule number, size of the nodules, and plant, root and shoot mass. As cultivars differed in their nodulation response to N and S, additional research would be helpful to screen other cultivars.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cigelske, B. D., Kandel, H., & DeSutter, T. M. (2020). Soybean Nodulation and Plant Response to Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization in the Northern US. Agricultural Sciences, 11(06), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2020.116037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free