Influence of beta blockers on survival in dogs with severe subaortic stenosis

28Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Subaortic stenosis (SAS) is one of the most common congenital cardiac defects in dogs. Severe SAS frequently is treated with a beta adrenergic receptor blocker (beta blocker), but this approach largely is empirical. Objective: To determine the influence of beta blocker treatment on survival time in dogs with severe SAS. Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of dogs diagnosed with severe, uncomplicated SAS (pressure gradient [PG] ≥80mmHg) between 1999 and 2011. Results: Fifty dogs met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven dogs were treated with a beta blocker and 23 received no treatment. Median age at diagnosis was significantly greater in the untreated group (1.2 versus 0.6years, respectively; P=.03). Median PG at diagnosis did not differ between the treated and untreated groups (127 versus 121mmHg, respectively; P=.2). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify the influence of PG at diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and beta blocker treatment on survival. In the all-cause multivariate mortality analysis, only age at diagnosis (P=.02) and PG at diagnosis (P=.03) affected survival time. In the cardiac mortality analysis, only PG influenced survival time (P=.03). Treatment with a beta blocker did not influence survival time in either the all-cause (P=.93) or cardiac-cause (P=.97) mortality analyses. Conclusions: Beta blocker treatment did not influence survival in dogs with severe SAS in our study, and a higher PG at diagnosis was associated with increased risk of death. © 2014 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eason, B. D., Fine, D. M., Leeder, D., Stauthammer, C., Lamb, K., & Tobias, A. H. (2014). Influence of beta blockers on survival in dogs with severe subaortic stenosis. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 28(3), 857–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12339

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free