Cooling-assisted microextraction: Comparison of techniques and applications

49Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the last decades, a special attention was given by the scientists to the cooling-assisted approach in many analytical methods, including solid-phase microextraction (SPME), liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), gas purge microsyringe extraction (GP-MSE), and solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE). Compared to conventional microextraction, the CA-ME strategy led to more effective methods, regarding extraction efficiency and their applicability to different sample matrices. All CA-ME systems which have been reported to date were reviewed and their important aspects were evaluated and compared. Generally, comparison of different cooling approaches revealed that the systems in which cooling is directly transmitted into the extraction phase, and/or cooling zone has adequate distance from the heating zone, are the most effective methods to increase the extraction efficiency, especially for the analysis of complicated solid matrices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghiasvand, A. R., Hajipour, S., & Heidari, N. (2016, March 1). Cooling-assisted microextraction: Comparison of techniques and applications. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.12.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free