Why we need a physically embodied turing test and what it might look like

30Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Turing test, as originally conceived, focused on language and reasoning; problems of perception and action were conspicuously absent. To serve as a benchmark for motivating and monitoring progress in AI research, this article proposes an extension to that original proposal that incorporates all four of these aspects of intelligence. Some initial suggestions are made regarding how best to structure such a test and how to measure progress. The proposed test also provides an opportunity to bring these four important areas of AI research back into sync after each has regrettably diverged into a fairly independent area of research of its own.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ortiz, C. L. (2016). Why we need a physically embodied turing test and what it might look like. AI Magazine, 37(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v37i1.2645

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free