Precision, consistency, and reproducibility of blood pressure in diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancy: The appraisal of repeated measurements

13Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A monitor (Spacelab 90207) was compared with sphygmomanometric blood pressure (BP) with respect to reproducibility and variations on precision and consistency. Some 133 women with type 1 diabetes mellitus and 59 non-diabetic women were recruited. During pregnancy, systolic BP was between 6 and 12 mmHg higher in the oscillometric than the auscultatory readings, and diastolic BP was between 1 and 2.6 mmHg. The association of difference with the mean BP disappeared with progression of pregnancy and the repetition of measurements in diabetic pregnancy. The precision, reproducibility, and trend of association over the scale of measurement were improved in the repeated compared to individual measurements, whereas consistency did not improve. © 2007 Taylor & Francis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lauszus, F. F., Rosgaard, A., Lousen, T., Rasmussen, O. W., Klebe, T. M., & Klebe, J. G. (2007). Precision, consistency, and reproducibility of blood pressure in diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancy: The appraisal of repeated measurements. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86(9), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340701472773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free