Comparison between two methods to calculate the transition matrix of orbit motion

14Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two methods to evaluate the state transition matrix are implemented and analyzed to verify the computational cost and the accuracy of both methods. This evaluation represents one of the highest computational costs on the artificial satellite orbit determination task. The first method is an approximation of the Keplerian motion, providing an analytical solution which is then calculated numerically by solving Kepler's equation. The second one is a local numerical approximation that includes the effect of J 2. The analysis is performed comparing these two methods with a reference generated by a numerical integrator. For small intervals of time (1 to 10s) and when one needs more accuracy, it is recommended to use the second method, since the CPU time does not excessively overload the computer during the orbit determination procedure. For larger intervals of time and when one expects more stability on the calculation, it is recommended to use the first method. Copyright © 2012 Ana Paula Marins Chiaradia et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiaradia, A. P. M., Kuga, H. K., & De Almeida Prado, A. F. B. (2012). Comparison between two methods to calculate the transition matrix of orbit motion. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/768973

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free