Do micro health insurance units need capital or reinsurance? A simulated exercise to examine different alternatives

15Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a technical discussion of capital loading that micro health insurance units (MIUs) must add to the premium to maintain financial sustainability. MIUs offer benefit packages and require prepayment, that is, they create a rudimentary community-based health insurance for poor people in low-income countries. We broke up the 2001 data set of a health insurer containing upward of 1.3 million insureds into 535 virtual MIUs; and running 1,005 iterations, we got a data yield of 537,675 virtual MIUs. Capital loading levels increased steeply with decreasing group size and higher confidence levels. The impact of group size remains strong even with groups of 25,000 plus, and is stronger than the impact of changes in confidence levels. We discuss options to correct size-related premium bias through government subsidies, and conclude that reinsurance is cheaper than capital loading and a preferable solution for governments compared to other alternatives. © 2006 The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dror, D. M., & Armstrong, J. (2006). Do micro health insurance units need capital or reinsurance? A simulated exercise to examine different alternatives. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 31(4), 739–761. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free