Accountability for SRHR in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

14Citations
Citations of this article
224Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Governments and international organisations are focused on COVID-19 crisis decision-making. As a result, global and national health governance contexts are changing dramatically, as are the social and political determinants of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). Various gender dimensions of the pandemic are clear. While initial data suggest that men are more vulnerable to COVID-19 related mortality, in many high, middle, and low-income countries, the “essential workers” and informal workers who are disproportionately exposed are disproportionately lower social status women. (Boniol et al., 2019; Wenham et al., 2020) Intersecting injustices mean that certain disadvantaged groups are particularly hard hit. (Morgan & Davies, 2020) They are left to reconcile the often-incompatible demands of precarious jobs, potential exposure to COVID-19, the stress of caring responsibilities under lockdown and, particularly for women, increased isolation exacerbating Gender-Based Violence (GBV). (Roesch et al., 2020; Garijo, 2020) In addition, they now face seriously disrupted health care services for SRH care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaaf, M., Boydell, V., Van Belle, S., Brinkerhoff, D. W., & George, A. (2020). Accountability for SRHR in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 1–0. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1779634

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free