Reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on various clinical conditions: an in vitro study

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on the location of the implant and the position of the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Six implants were installed in different dentate sextants of six artificial bone models. Implant stability was measured in three conditions of the bone model (without mounting on a phantom head, mounted on a phantom head in supine position, and mounted on a phantom head in upright position). A resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell) and two damping capacity analysis devices (Periotest and Anycheck) were used to measure implant stability. The values measured outside the phantom head were treated as controls, and the values inside the phantom head were compared using an independent t -test. RESULTS. Osstell showed different results in two of the six divisions in both the supine and upright positions compared to outside of the mouth (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. N., Kim, M. S., Lee, J. Y., Zihan, X., Ryu, J. J., & Shim, J. S. (2023). Reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on various clinical conditions: an in vitro study. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 15(3), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free