Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?

28Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in the presence of anatomical malformations or inaccessible lower pole stones. However, due to the advancements in laser and scope technology, RIRS is expanding its indications with the potential benefits of lower complications and a shorter hospital stay. Methods: A literature search using the PUBMED database from inception to June 2022 was performed to explore the current role of PCNL in endourology. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis. Results: PCNL confirmed its role in the treatment of large and complex stones; moreover, miniaturized PCNL has become more competitive, gaining space among classic indications of flexible ureteroscopy. Conclusions: considering all the evaluated subgroups, we can conclude that PCNL is an old fascinating procedure and is here to stay.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Lorenzis, E., Zanetti, S. P., Boeri, L., & Montanari, E. (2022, September 1). Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free