Reliability of Artificial Intelligence in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of lateral cephalometric analysis performed by an artificial intelligence-dependent software program. Materials and Methods: One Hundred and Eighty digital cephalometric radiographs acquired by Vatech PaX-i X-ray machine, were used in the study. The anatomical landmarks of both Steiner and McNamara analyses were manually traced using a third-party software AudaxCeph Empower, version 6.6.12.4731 (Audax d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia), the tracing was performed by two radiologists with more than 5 years of experience in digital cephalometry to determine the inter-reliability, then it was repeated with an interval of two weeks to determine the intra-reliability. The landmarks were retraced automatically through the fully automatic option on the same software program using convolutional neural network. Results: Regarding McNamara analysis, the results of this study showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements, with an interclass correlation coefficient >0.9. Regarding Steiner analysis, our results showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements (0.75

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hesham, N., Ashmawy, M., & Samir, S. (2024). Reliability of Artificial Intelligence in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis. Ain Shams Dental Journal (Egypt), 33(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.260733.1200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free