Generative AI platforms as institutional catalysts of digital entrepreneurship: Enablement, dependence & power dynamics

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study theorizes how recent generative AI (Gen AI) platforms operate as institutional catalysts of platform-dependent entrepreneurship (PDE). Integrating institutional theory, the external enablement framework, and innovation platform theory, we propose an integrative framework for explaining the emergence of PDE under reliance on non-substitutable, platform-governed capabilities. Using an abductive mixed-method case study of OpenAI's ecosystem (2020–2025), we trace how governance, boundary resources, and institutional signals shape entrepreneurial feasibility, scaling, and vulnerability. Our analysis identifies four catalytic institutional mechanisms—Infrastructure Provision, Capability Scaffolding, Market Legitimization, and Ecosystem Orchestration—that enable venture creation while simultaneously generating dependence. Temporal analysis reveals an enablement–dependence paradox: platforms accelerate entry by democratizing frontier capabilities, yet accumulate dependencies that expose ventures to governance shocks. Empirically, we show how enthusiasm gave way to crisis during OpenAI's GPT-5 release, illustrating governance overreach, trust erosion cascades, and choice removal as control. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nzembayie, K. F., & Urbano, D. (2026). Generative AI platforms as institutional catalysts of digital entrepreneurship: Enablement, dependence & power dynamics. Technology in Society, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free