Cost-effectiveness of personalised telehealth intervention for chronic disease management: A pilot randomised controlled trial

11Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective The study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of a personalised telehealth intervention to manage chronic disease in the long run. Method The Personalised Health Care (PHC) pilot study was a randomised trial with an economic evaluation alongside over 12 months. From a health service perspective, the primary analysis compared the costs and effectiveness of PHC telehealth monitoring with usual care. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated based on costs and health-related quality of life. The PHC intervention was implemented in the Barwon Health region, Geelong, Australia, for patients with a diagnosis of COPD and/or diabetes who had a high likelihood of hospital readmission over 12 months. Results When compared to usual care at 12 months, the PHC intervention cost AUD$714 extra per patient (95%CI -4879; 6308) with a significant improvement of 0.09 in health-related quality of life (95%CI: 0.05; 0.14). The probability of PHC being cost-effective by 12 months was close to 65%, at willingness to pay a threshold of AUD$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year. Conclusion Benefits of PHC to patients and the health system at 12 months translated to a gain in quality- adjusted life years with a non-significant cost difference between the intervention and control groups. Given the relatively high set-up costs of the PHC intervention, the program may need to be offered to a larger population to achieve cost-effectiveness. Long-term follow- up is required to assess the real health and economic benefits over time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mudiyanselage, S. B., Stevens, J., Toscano, J., Kotowicz, M. A., Steinfort, C. L., Hayles, R., & Watts, J. J. (2023). Cost-effectiveness of personalised telehealth intervention for chronic disease management: A pilot randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 18(6 June). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free