One-year clinical evaluation of the retention of resin and glass ionomer sealants on permanent first molars in children

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the retention of glass ionomer cement (GIC) used as fissure sealant with a resinbased sealant. Methods: Six-to nine-year-old children (n=96) with all permanent first molars in occlusion were examined and assigned to two groups: GIC sealant or resin-based sealant. The sealants were applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The assessment of sealant retention was performed at two-month interval sessions (n=6), when each sample was scored according to the following criteria: complete retention, partial retention or complete loss. The visual and tactile examinations were carried out with a WHO probe, mouth mirror, air syringe and artificial light. The data were submitted to descriptive statistics and survival analysis. Results: A total of 384 occlusal surfaces were analyzed. Independent of the tooth and evaluation time, slightly better results were achieved by the resin-based sealant, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: GIC and resin-based sealants achieved similar results with regards to retention during a one-year follow-up period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graciano, K. P., Moysés, M. R., Ribeiro, J. C., Pazzini, C. A., Melgaço, C. A., & Ramos-Jorge, J. (2015). One-year clinical evaluation of the retention of resin and glass ionomer sealants on permanent first molars in children. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, 14(3), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free