Antithrombotic Regimen After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure ― A Real-World Study ―

10Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients at high risk of bleeding remains controversial. We present real-world clinical outcomes of LAAC. Methods and Results: Data from 74 consecutive patients who received LAAC therapy between January 2020 and June 2022 were analyzed. Patients received 1 of 3 antithrombotic therapies according to the bleeding risk category or clinical event. Regimen 1 was based on a prior study, regimen 2 comprised a lower antiplatelet drug dose without dual antiplatelet therapy, and regimen 3 was antiplatelet drug administration for as long as possible to patients with uncontrollable bleeding who were required to stop anticoagulant drugs. Overall, 73 (98.6%) procedures were successful. Of them, 16 (21.9%) patients were selected for regimen 1, 46 (63.0%) for regimen 2, and 11 (15.1%) for regimen 3. Device-related thrombosis (13% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P=0.0257) only occurred with regimen 1. There was no difference in major bleeding event rates (6% vs. 2% vs. 9%, P=0.53). Conclusions: The post-LAAC antithrombotic regimen was modified without major concerns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ryuzaki, S., Kondo, Y., Nakano, M., Nakano, M., Kajiyama, T., Ito, R., … Kobayashi, Y. (2023). Antithrombotic Regimen After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure ― A Real-World Study ―. Circulation Journal, 87(12), 1820–1827. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0687

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free