Results of HLA antibody testing using ELISA vs the fluorescent bead method and retrospective review of data for recipients of packed RBCs and platelets from male HLA-immunized donors

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We reviewed HLA antibody testing results using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for all male blood donors at our institution during a 3.5-month period to look for HLA immunization. Confirmatory testing of 33 blood samples positive for HLA class I and/or II antibodies was performed using the fluorescent bead method. A retrospective review of recipients of packed RBCs and platelets processed from these 33 HLA-immunized male donors were conducted to identify transfusion-related acute lung injury and cognate antigens. The agreement rates between the methods for HLA class I and II antibodies were 21% (7/33) and 6% (2/33), respectively. We noted HLA antibodies in the male donors corresponding to cognate antigens in 2 recipients of packed RBCs and in 3 recipients of platelets. Of 8 donors positive for HLA antibodies, 5 did not have a history of blood transfusion. We conclude that ELISA was too sensitive and had a high false-positive rate for the detection of HLA class II antibodies. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aung, F. M., Cano, P., Fernandez-Vina, M., & Lichtiger, B. (2011, January). Results of HLA antibody testing using ELISA vs the fluorescent bead method and retrospective review of data for recipients of packed RBCs and platelets from male HLA-immunized donors. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP98JNYHGCGMHK

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free