A Rare Case of Persistent Bacteremia: Leadless Micra Pacemaker Endocarditis

  • Patel H
  • Harrell S
  • Hreibe H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Leadless pacing systems have revolutionized the field of electrophysiology given its low complication rates and almost non-existent rate of infections compared with traditional pacemakers. These devices boast resistance to infections given its unique features; however, as described in this report, device-related infection from these leadless devices is still possible. In patients with leadless pacing system that is persistently bacteremic in the future, evaluation of the device with transesophageal echocardiogram or intracardiac echocardiography should be performed, and if vegetation is noted on the device, device extraction should highly be considered, along with empiric intravenous antibiotics. Lastly, new leadless device should not be re-implanted within 2 weeks of the removal of the infected device to prevent seeding of the new device.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, H., Harrell, S., Hreibe, H., Sharkawi, M., & AlJaroudi, W. (2023). A Rare Case of Persistent Bacteremia: Leadless Micra Pacemaker Endocarditis. Case Reports in Cardiology, 2023, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8326020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free