Translational neurorehabilitation research in the third world: What barriers to trial participation can teach us

13Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-: Most stroke rehabilitation studies have been performed in high-income countries. The aim of this study was to identify the main barriers for patient inclusion in a research protocol performed in Brazil. METHODS-: We evaluated reasons for exclusion of patients in a pilot, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial of stroke rehabilitation. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS-: Only 5.6% of 571 screened patients were included. Recurrent stroke was responsible for exclusion of 45.4% of potentially eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS-: Recurrent stroke represented a big barrier to enroll patients in the protocol. External validity of rehabilitation trials will benefit from definition of study criteria according to regional characteristics of patients, including rates of recurrent stroke. © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anjos, S. M., Cohen, L. G., Sterr, A., De Andrade, K. N. F., & Conforto, A. B. (2014). Translational neurorehabilitation research in the third world: What barriers to trial participation can teach us. Stroke, 45(5), 1495–1497. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free