Social isolation and patient experience in older adults

34Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE Social isolation has been identified as a major health problem, particularly in the elderly. In the present study, we examine the association between social isolation and patient experience in elderly primary care patients. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in a primary care practice– based research network (28 clinics) in Japan. We assessed social isolation using an abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale and patient experience of primary care using a Japanese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (JPCAT), which comprises 6 domains: first contact, longitudinality, coordination, comprehensiveness (services available), comprehensiveness (services provided), and community orientation. We used a linear mixed effects model to adjust clustering within clinics and individual covariates. RESULTS Data were analyzed for 465 elderly primary care patients aged ≥65 years. After adjustment for possible confounders and clustering within clinics, social isolation was negatively associated with the JPCAT total score, (mean difference =-3.67; 95% CI,-7.00 to-0.38). Among the JPCAT domain scores, social isolation was significantly associated with longitudinality, comprehensiveness (ser-vice provided), and community orientation scores. CONCLUSIONS Social isolation was associated with negative patient experience in elderly primary care patients. Raising awareness regarding patient social networks among primary care providers and targeted interventions for socially isolated elderly patients aimed at improving the experience of primary care, especially regarding longitudinality, comprehensiveness, and community orientation, may be warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aoki, T., Yamamoto, Y., Ikenoue, T., Urushibara-Miyachi, Y., Kise, M., Fujinuma, Y., & Fukuhara, S. (2018). Social isolation and patient experience in older adults. Annals of Family Medicine, 16(5), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free