Hospital staffing and health care-associated infections: A systematic review of the literature

82Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the past 10 years, many researchers have examined relationships between hospital staffing and patients' risk of health care-associated infection (HAI). To gain understanding of this evidence base, a systematic review was conducted, and 42 articles were audited. The most common infection studied was bloodstream infection (n = 18; 43%). The majority of researchers examined nurse staffing (n = 38; 90%); of these, only 7 (18%) did not find a statistically significant association between nurse staffing variable(s) and HAI rates. Use of nonpermanent staff was associated with increased rates of HAI in 4 studies (P < .05). Three studies addressed infection control professional staffing with mixed results. Physician staffing was not found to be associated with patients' HAI risk (n = 2). The methods employed and operational definitions used for both staffing and HAI varied; despite this variability, trends were apparent. Research characterizing effective staffing for infection control departments is needed. © 2008 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stone, P. W., Pogorzelska, M., Kunches, L., & Hirschhorn, L. R. (2008, October 1). Hospital staffing and health care-associated infections: A systematic review of the literature. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/591696

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free