Between signing and ratifying: Preratification politics, the disability convention, and the Dutch

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ever-increasing scholarship on the politics of human rights focuses on either international treaty negotiations or domestic politics after ratification. It thus misses how the stage of implementation is often crucially set in the period between signing and ratifying. This article addresses this lacuna via an in-depth discussion of the ratification process of the Disability Convention (CRPD) in the Netherlands. In this period, stakeholders highlight certain treaty obligations, while downplaying or ignoring others. This theory of preratification politics calls for more differentiation between treaty obligations and attention to the politics of their mobilization, even in the most monist countries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oomen, B. (2018). Between signing and ratifying: Preratification politics, the disability convention, and the Dutch. Human Rights Quarterly, 40(2), 420–446. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2018.0021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free