Xanthine oxidase inhibitors and sepsis

21Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Xanthine oxidase activation occurs in sepsis and results in the generation of uric acid (UrAc) and reactive oxygen species (ROS). We aimed to evaluate the effect of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOis) in rats stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). LPS (10 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) immediately after allopurinol (Alo, 2 mg/kg) or febuxostat (Feb, 1 mg/kg) every 24 h for 3 days. To increase UrAc levels, oxonic acid (Oxo) was administered by gavage (750 mg/kg per day) for 5 days. Animals were divided into the following 10 groups (n = 6 each): (1) Control, (2) Alo, (3) Feb, (4) LPS, (5) LPSAlo, (6) LPSFeb, (7) Oxo, (8) OxoLPS, (9) OxoLPSAlo, and (10) OxoLPSFeb. Feb with or without Oxo did not aggravate sepsis. LPS administration (with or without Oxo) significantly decreased the creatinine clearance (ClCr) in LPSAlo (60%, P < 0.01) versus LPS (44%, P < 0.05) and LPSFeb (35%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, a significant increase in mortality was observed with LPSAlo (28/34, 82%) compared to LPS treatment alone (10/16, 63%) and LPSFeb (11/17, 65%, P < 0.05). In addition, increased levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-10 were observed at 72 h compared to the groups that received LPS and LPSFeb with or without Oxo. In this study, coadministration of Alo in LPS-induced experimental sepsis aggravated septic shock, leading to mortality, renal function impairment, and high ROS and proinflammatory IL levels. In contrast, administration of Feb did not potentiate sepsis, probably because it did not interfere with other metabolic events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramos, M. F. de P., Monteiro de Barros, A. do C. M., Razvickas, C. V., Borges, F. T., & Schor, N. (2018). Xanthine oxidase inhibitors and sepsis. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, 32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058738418772210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free