Factors affecting pouch-related outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purposes: Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis (UC) despite morbidities that can lead to pouch failure. We aimed to identify factors associated with pouch-related morbidities. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RPC with IPAA was performed. To investigate the factors associated with pouch-related morbidities, patients’ preoperative demographic and clinical factors, and intraoperative factors were included in the analysis. Results: A total of 49 patients with UC, FAP, and colorectal cancer were included. Twenty patients (40.8%) experienced leakage-related, functional, and/or pouchitis-related morbidities. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 2 or 3 had a higher risk of functional morbidity than those with grade 1. Intraoperative blood loss exceeding 300.0 mL was associated with an increased risk of pouchitis-related morbidity. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated associations of higher ASA grade and increased intraoperative blood loss with poor functional outcomes and pouchitis, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noh, G. T., Han, J., Cho, M. S., Hur, H., Min, B. S., Lee, K. Y., & Kim, N. K. (2017). Factors affecting pouch-related outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy. PLoS ONE, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186596

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free