Partial Wh-Movement and Wh-Copying in Dutch: Evidence for an Indirect Dependency Approach

  • Schippers A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt:This article reports on a magnitude estimation experiment investigating the grammatical status of partial wh-movement and wh-copying versus standard long-distance movement in Dutch. The results show that long-distance wh-movement is rated most acceptable, followed by wh-copying and finally partial wh-movement. Of interest is the significant difference in acceptability in partial wh-movement and wh-copying. It is argued that these results speak in favor of a so-called Indirect Dependency Approach to partial wh-movement in which partial wh-movement is analyzed as a structurally altogether different construction from long-distance wh-movement. Wh-copying, on the other hand, is argued to be a surface alternative to long-distance movement, where an intermediate movement copy has been spelled out.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schippers, A. (2010). Partial Wh-Movement and Wh-Copying in Dutch: Evidence for an Indirect Dependency Approach. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 36(1), 338. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v36i1.3922

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free