Art as Agent: A Posthumanist Musing over Teaching and Learning Music

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Agency, according to posthumanist theories, is not a trait possessed only by human beings. All things, beings, and concepts bring drive and desire to an event. A pencil or a piece of music will in other words do something in their involvement with other agents. While this at first glance may seem far-fetched, any artist or musician will recognize that creating with tools is a negotiation with the tool or that playing a piece of music is a negotiation with the piece. This negotiation can feel like a battle of wills between the artist, the tool, and the material or between the musician, the instrument, and the work of music—to pick two examples. A classic model of what constitutes education is the relational triangle from the German Didaktik where education is constituted through the relations between a teacher, a learner, and some agreed-upon content. This article explores what happens to a view of education in the arts when all three participants in this triangle are considered active participants with agency. We muse over issues we have encountered in music teaching and learning and attempt to make sense of these from a posthumanist perspective. The aim being to help ourselves and the reader to make sense of what a posthumanist perspective might imply for music education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asplund, J., & Thorgersen, K. T. (2025). Art as Agent: A Posthumanist Musing over Teaching and Learning Music. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 59(2), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.5406/15437809.59.2.06

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free