ACCUMULATION OF PHOSPHORUS, DRY MATTER AND BETAINE DURING NaCl STRESS OF SPLIT‐ROOT CITRUS SEEDLINGS COLONIZED WITH VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI ON ZERO, ONE OR TWO HALVES

59Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sodium chloride tolerance and phosphorus content were examined in split‐root Carrizo citrange seedlings [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. ×Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] colonized with a vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus intraradices Schenck & Smith) on zero, one or two root halves. Plants were treated with NaCl at 0, 25, 50 or 100 mM, and the degree of stress was measured as reduction of dry matter accumulation and rise in level of leaf proline‐betaine (stachydrine). Shoot and root dry weight production during this period decreased with increasing levels of salt. Absolute reductions were similar for plants inoculated on one vs two half‐root systems, but percentage decreases were less in the latter due to greater overall growth in all treatments. Betaine levels in leaf tissues were positively related to soil salt levels for each mycorrhizal treatment. Significant differences in betaine levels were also detected in plants with and without mycorrhizal fungi, and mean levels tended to be higher for those colonized on one vs two halves of their root system. In contrast, a half‐root system and its fungal symbiont supplied enough phosphorus to allow concentrations of leaf P to equal those of fully infected root systems, yet the two groups did not show equal growth under control conditions or percentage reductions with NaCl stress. Copyright © 1986, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DUKE, E. R., JOHNSON, C. R., & KOCH, K. E. (1986). ACCUMULATION OF PHOSPHORUS, DRY MATTER AND BETAINE DURING NaCl STRESS OF SPLIT‐ROOT CITRUS SEEDLINGS COLONIZED WITH VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI ON ZERO, ONE OR TWO HALVES. New Phytologist, 104(4), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00658.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free