Comparison of the survival of different isolates of SARS-CoV-2 in evaporating aerosols

10Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Numerous variants of SARS-CoV-2 with increased transmissibility have emerged over the course of the pandemic. Potential explanations for the increased transmissibility of these variants include increased shedding from infected individuals, increased environmental stability, and/or a lower infectious dose. Upon exhalation of a respiratory particle into the environment, water present in the particle is rapidly lost through evaporation, resulting in a decrease in particle size. The aim of the present study was to compare the losses of infectivity of different isolates of SARS-CoV-2 during the rapid evaporation of aerosol particles that occurs immediately post-generation to assess if there are differences suggestive of increased survival, and ultimately greater transmissibility, for more recent variants. Losses of infectivity of several isolates of SARS-CoV-2 suspended in viral culture media were assessed following aerosolization and evaporation in a flowing chamber. The results demonstrate that losses of infectivity measured post-evaporation were similar for three different isolates of SARS-CoV-2, including isolates from the more recent Delta and Omicron lineages. The average loss in infectivity across all three isolates was 61 ± 15% (−0.46 ± 0.17 log10 TCID50/L-air) at a relative humidity <30%. These results, together with those from several previous studies, suggest that it is unlikely that an increase in environmental stability contributes to the observed increases in transmissibility observed with more recent variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dabisch, P. A., Wood, S. P., Holland, B. P., Boydston, J. A., Beck, K. E., Green, B., & Biryukov, J. (2022). Comparison of the survival of different isolates of SARS-CoV-2 in evaporating aerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology, 56(12), 1146–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2128712

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free