The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since total neoadjuvant treatment achieves almost 30% pathologic complete response, organ preservation has been increasingly debated for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment for patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. Two organ preservation strategies are available: a watch and wait strategy and a local excision strategy including patients with a near clinical complete response. A major issue is the selection of patients according to the initial tumor staging or the response assessment. Despite modern imaging improvement, identifying complete response remains challenging. A better selection could be possible by radiomics analyses, exploiting numerous image features to feed data characterization algorithms. The subsequent step is to include baseline and/or pre-therapeutic MRI, PET-CT, and CT radiomics added to the patients’ clinicopathological data, inside machine learning (ML) prediction models, with predictive or prognostic purposes. These models could be further improved by the addition of new biomarkers such as circulating tumor biomarkers, molecular profiling, or pathological immune biomarkers. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amintas, S., Giraud, N., Fernandez, B., Dupin, C., Denost, Q., Garant, A., … Vendrely, V. (2023, November 1). The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer. Current Treatment Options in Oncology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01125-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free