Are renewables as friendly to humans as to the environment?: A social life cycle assessment of renewable electricity

48Citations
Citations of this article
189Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The adoption of renewable energy technologies in developing nations is recognized to have positive environmental impacts; however, what are their effects on the electricity supply chain workers? This article provides a quantitative analysis on this question through a relatively new framework called social life cycle assessment, taking Malaysia as a case example. Impact assessments by the authors show that electricity from renewables has greater adverse impacts on supply chain workers than the conventional electricity mix: Electricity production with biomass requires 127% longer labor hours per unit-electricity under the risk of human rights violations, while the solar photovoltaic requires 95% longer labor hours per unit-electricity. However, our assessment also indicates that renewables have less impacts per dollar-spent. In fact, the impact of solar photovoltaic would be 60% less than the conventional mix when it attains grid parity. The answer of "are renewables as friendly to humans as to the environment?" is "not-yet, but eventually".

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takeda, S., Keeley, A. R., Sakurai, S., Managi, S., & Norris, C. B. (2019). Are renewables as friendly to humans as to the environment?: A social life cycle assessment of renewable electricity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free