Prognostic factors of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate prognostic risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis through a meta-analysis. Methods: Chinese and English databases were comprehensively searched from the start of the study to January 2025. Observational studies reporting multi-variable adjusted risk ratios (HRS) for prognostic factors of sepsis in adults were included. Data extraction and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1, and effect estimates were summarized using fixed or random effects models based on heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies involving 69 potential factors were included. A meta-analysis was performed on 15 factors. Increase in age (HR: 1.01), acute kidney injury (HR: 1.48), cancer (HR: 1.21), liver disease (HR: 1.58), septic shock (HR: 2.22), APACHE II (HR: 1.06), SOFA (HR: 1.19), SAPS II score (HR: 1.02), lactate (HR: 1.07) and red blood cell distribution width (HR: 1.07) were significant risk factors. Diabetes (HR: 0.80) and urinary tract infection (HR: 0.47) were protective factors. A high degree of heterogeneity was observed in some factors. Conclusions: Multiple factors have a significant impact on the mortality of sepsis. Early identification of these risk factors can guide clinical intervention strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qin, C., Ma, D., Pang, L., Hu, M., Lin, S., Zhou, Z., … Ji, C. (2025, December 1). Prognostic factors of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-12094-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free