The comparison of CPAP and oral appliances in treatment of patients with OSA: A systematic review and meta-analysis

65Citations
Citations of this article
175Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of oral appliances (OAs) with those of CPAP in treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved from the following electronic databases, up to and including September 2012: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Central Register of Controlled Trials. The main outcomes were Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, health-related quality of life, cognitive performance, blood pressure, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), arousal index, minimum SpO2, percent rapid eye movement sleep, treatment usage, side effects, treatment preference, and withdrawals. RESULTS: Fourteen trials were finally included in this review. Our results demonstrated that the effects on Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (P.31 and.09 in crossover and parallel-group trials), health-related quality of life, cognitive performance, and blood pressure of OAs and CPAP were similar. Besides, pooled estimates of crossover trials suggested a significant difference in favor of CPAP regarding AHI (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, W., Xiao, L., & Hu, J. (2013). The comparison of CPAP and oral appliances in treatment of patients with OSA: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiratory Care, 58(7), 1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02245

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free