Supervisor vs. Subordinate Perception on Leader-Member Exchange Quality: A Malaysian Perspective

  • Chooi Hwa A
  • Jantani M
  • Ansari M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is considerable research evidence (e.g., Campbell, White, & Johnson, 2003; Schriesheim, Neider, & Scandura, 1998; Xin, 2004) to suggest that supervisors and subordinates do not agree about the quality of their relationships. Since these past studies were mainly found in the western countries, this study was undertaken to investigate the dimensionality of a specific leader-member exchange (LMX) measure across two different samples in the Malaysian context. Accordingly, we employed a principal components analysis on LMX data obtained from two different sources: 229 employees and their 109 immediate supervisors representing various organizations in Northern Malaysia. As expected, we found that employees’ perceptions of the quality of exchanges differ from those of their supervisors. The implications of these findings for future research on LMX are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chooi Hwa, A. M., Jantani, M., & Ansari, M. A. (2009). Supervisor vs. Subordinate Perception on Leader-Member Exchange Quality: A Malaysian Perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n7p165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free