Characterisation of water quality in effluents of land-based abalone farms in the Western Cape, South Africa

3Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Effluent water quality was measured at 9 abalone (Haliotis midae) farms in 2 regional nodes (west and south) along the South African coastline. For most farms, effluent total suspended solids (TSS) exceeded the background reference level (80th percentile), and 3 did not comply with the 5 mg l-1 standard. Total ammonia nitrogen (NH4+) concentrations were mostly greater than reference levels but well below the 43 μmol N l-1 standard. Inflow-corrected concentrations of nitrate, nitrite and phosphate were low compared to NH4+ and would not pose a significant eutrophication risk. Similarly, the biochemical oxygen demand measured at 3 of the farms was low (median 1.31 mg l-1). Abalone production-specific annual loads of TSS (334 kg per metric tonne [mt]), total N (20.3-38.1 kg N mt-1) and total P (3.2-7.5 kg P mt-1) agree with what has been found for different land-based aquaculture operations. These figures translate to N-based human population equivalents of 5.4-10.6 persons mt-1 for both regions. At the broader ecosystem level, the annual TSS loads calculated from 2013 production data of 43 mt yr-1 (west) and 369 mt yr-1 (south) are, respectively, 0.35 and 2.8% of that estimated for kelp erosion. Similarly, the dissolved inorganic N loads of 1.9 mt N yr-1 (west) and 9.4 mt yr-1 (south) are trivial by comparison with nitrate advected during upwelling. Local abalone farms have a relatively high specific C footprint-conservatively ~44 kg CO2 kg-1 production. Our findings support a relatively low potential impact of farm effluents in this coastal upwelling environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Probyn, T. A., Pretorius, M., Seanego, K., & Bernatzeder, A. (2017). Characterisation of water quality in effluents of land-based abalone farms in the Western Cape, South Africa. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 9(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00217

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free