Knowledge exchange enhances engagement in ecological restoration and rehabilitation initiatives

16Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Effective knowledge sharing and community engagement can be major enablers in the pursuit of socially relevant benefits from ecological restoration and rehabilitation. Focusing on two ecological restoration and rehabilitation practitioner organizations and their workers, this paper evaluates perceptions of the extent to which short-term knowledge exchange contributes to social goals in ecological restoration and rehabilitation in South Africa through (1) stakeholder engagement and awareness of community well-being, and (2) knowledge enrichment. Data collected through impact questionnaires, participatory site visits, practical work exchange, focus group discussions, and a workshop are analyzed using thematic analysis framed by the International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration #1 and #2. We explore participants' perceptions of knowledge exchange benefits and discuss implications for future collaboration in establishing long-term knowledge exchange. Findings show that knowledge exchange is perceived to result in enhanced teamwork engagement, and strengthened knowledge on restoration techniques through mutual learning, inspiration, and a strengthened sense of community. Findings suggest that sustained knowledge exchange and engagement activities between different practitioner organizations is key to realize and transform short-term perceived benefits into long-term applied socioecological impacts across landscapes in dryland Africa. There is a need to progress from short-term, horizontal learning, to long-term (horizontal and vertical) knowledge exchange, to inform restoration project design and implementation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Favretto, N., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., & Kruger, L. (2022). Knowledge exchange enhances engagement in ecological restoration and rehabilitation initiatives. Restoration Ecology, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13565

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free